Proposal Review

Reviewer Name*

First Last

Proposal ID #*

Reviewer Email*

Objective or Purpose*

Objective or purpose provides a well developed focus/issue/problem related to teaching and/or curriculum.

1) No
2) Somewhat
3) Yes

Content of Presentation: Philosophical, Theoretical, or Practical Argument*

Proposal provides a sound methodology (if research study) and/or philosophical, theoretical, or practical argument connected to the focus/issue/problem indicated.

1) No
2) Somewhat
3) Yes

Session: Literature, sources, or evidence to support the argument/analysis*

Argument/analysis is well supported by findings (if research study) and/or claims made.

1) No
2) Somewhat
3) Yes

Conclusions, Implications, and Significance*

Justifies presentation's contributions to the world of teaching and/or curriculum.

1) No
2) Somewhat
3) Yes

Relevance*

Proposal explains how the session promotes a timely/relevant discussion, raises pertinent issues and is of relevance to AATC members.

1) No
2) Somewhat
3) Yes

Rate proposal's quality of writing*

1) Weak
2) Good
3) Strong

Total Score*

Add the total points for the five items above. The maximum score (3 for each item) is 18.

Would you attend the session?*

Yes
No

Recommendation*

Accept
Accept if space
Reject

Confidential comments to the conference program chair

Please include comments that might be helpful to the conference program chair

Helpful comments to author

Please include constructive comments to be forwarded to the author.

Reviewer Form