Proposal Review Reviewer Form Reviewer Name* First Last Proposal ID #* Reviewer Email* Objective or Purpose*Objective or purpose provides a well developed focus/issue/problem related to teaching and/or curriculum. 1) No 2) Somewhat 3) Yes Content of Presentation: Philosophical, Theoretical, or Practical Argument*Proposal provides a sound methodology (if research study) and/or philosophical, theoretical, or practical argument connected to the focus/issue/problem indicated. 1) No 2) Somewhat 3) Yes Session: Literature, sources, or evidence to support the argument/analysis*Argument/analysis is well supported by findings (if research study) and/or claims made. 1) No 2) Somewhat 3) Yes Conclusions, Implications, and Significance*Justifies presentation's contributions to the world of teaching and/or curriculum. 1) No 2) Somewhat 3) Yes Relevance*Proposal explains how the session promotes a timely/relevant discussion, raises pertinent issues and is of relevance to AATC members. 1) No 2) Somewhat 3) Yes Rate proposal's quality of writing* 1) Weak 2) Good 3) Strong Total Score*Add the total points for the five items above. The maximum score (3 for each item) is 18. Would you attend the session?* Yes No Recommendation* Accept Accept if space Reject Confidential comments to the conference program chairPlease include comments that might be helpful to the conference program chairHelpful comments to authorPlease include constructive comments to be forwarded to the author.